Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. 3B peers

Rank #3 of 55

Each bar is one 3B, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Sal Stewart
Sal Stewart · #3
V⁻ -8VORP 49V⁺ 66
Sal Stewart

Sal Stewart

1B / 3B·CIN
Compare
Compare
PA
507
H
113
HR
25
AVG
.254
xwOBA
.346
PPG
2.71
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj92399.265.338.463.199.35419.4%9.3%10.1%1782422.63—
2026117507.254
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
65
.346
xBA
28
.238
xSLG
.336
.474
.220
.346
22.1%
10.3%
11.8%
25
12
317
2.71
—
20252258.255.293.545.290.39925.9%5.2%20.7%52452.05—
72
.453
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
67
90.4
Median EV
50
92.5
90th % EV
66
106.4
Barrel %
85
13.6
Hard-Hit %
35
39.5
Sweet-Spot %
29
33.9
Bat Speed
Avg
48
70.4
Median
29
70.2
90th %
40
76.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
55
29.3
Whiff %
37
23.1
K %
40
22.1
BB %
65
10.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
102
≈ 59th pctl
Chase cost
-7.8r
74 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.2r
49 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.1%
414 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.43
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
12111+29%7+10%10+22%9+21%19+71%7+67%63+42%12-11%28-11%19-12%24+0%15+83%6+50%6+23%13-6%18-30%23-28%32+5%20+57%75+0%6+42%12+0%2543+33%613+25%8+0%91CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 414