Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. OF peers

Rank #44 of 236

Each bar is one OF, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150+200Sal Frelick
Sal Frelick · #44
V⁻ 2VORP 20V⁺ 58
Sal Frelick

Sal Frelick

OF·MIL
Compare
Compare
PA
247
H
50
HR
3
AVG
.233
xwOBA
.293
PPG
1.91
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj79342.259.326.365.106.31213.3%8.5%4.7%5101782.25—
202666247.233
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
8
.293
xBA
27
.239
xSLG
.310
.316
.083
.293
10.1%
9.3%
0.8%
3
5
126
1.91
—
2025151594.288.354.405.117.30213.5%7.9%5.6%12203572.36—
2024150524.259.320.335.076.28614.9%7.4%7.5%2192591.73—
202364223.246.345.351.105.29816.6%12.6%4.0%381282.00—
4
.315
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
7
85.4
Median EV
14
88.8
90th % EV
34
103.6
Barrel %
3
2.1
Hard-Hit %
4
28.0
Sweet-Spot %
3
27.5
Bat Speed
Avg
8
66.4
Median
10
68.0
90th %
13
73.4
Plate Discipline
Chase %
86
22.4
Whiff %
97
9.5
K %
96
10.1
BB %
50
9.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
103
≈ 61th pctl
Chase cost
-5.2r
48 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.9r
53 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
42.1%
337 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.41
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
45241251+25%12+0%6+33%6+0%712-4%24-24%17-44%16+15%1354+33%12-44%16-27%26-26%31-33%15+13%8345+19%16+50%14+57%72514CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 337