Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. SS peers

Rank #44 of 68

Each bar is one SS, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150Nasim Nuñez
Nasim Nuñez · #44
V⁻ -34VORP -23V⁺ -10
Nasim Nuñez

Nasim Nuñez

2B / SS·WSN
Compare
Compare
PA
392
H
78
HR
1
AVG
.229
xwOBA
.271
PPG
1.63
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj56240.225.302.296.070.27722.2%9.8%12.4%220921.65—
2026105392.229
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
4
.271
xBA
9
.220
xSLG
.318
.268
.039
.271
20.7%
11.0%
9.7%
1
40
171
1.63
—
20253296.221.287.384.163.29720.8%8.3%12.5%47521.63—
20243778.246.370.262.016.27219.2%15.4%3.8%05280.76—
0
.268
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
1
81.8
Median EV
1
85.6
90th % EV
3
98.5
Barrel %
1
0.4
Hard-Hit %
3
21.3
Sweet-Spot %
12
31.5
Bat Speed
Avg
5
65.9
Median
5
66.9
90th %
8
71.7
Plate Discipline
Chase %
79
24.6
Whiff %
67
19.0
K %
49
20.7
BB %
70
11.0
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
105
≈ 70th pctl
Chase cost
-5.6r
61 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.6r
49 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
45.6%
353 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.31
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
2421314+38%8+0%8+21%14+0%13+14%715+17%18-41%17-24%29-24%21+33%95+67%6-7%28-9%23-20%15+7%15+29%714+67%6+9%11+0%8421142412CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 353