Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. OF peers

Rank #31 of 236

Each bar is one OF, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150+200Jung Hoo Lee
Jung Hoo Lee · #31
V⁻ 0VORP 34V⁺ 57
Jung Hoo Lee

Jung Hoo Lee

OF·SFG
Compare
Compare
PA
269
H
82
HR
4
AVG
.325
xwOBA
.335
PPG
2.53
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj87377.269.328.394.125.32211.5%7.5%4.0%542072.38—
202666269.325
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
49
.335
xBA
99
.316
xSLG
.361
.448
.123
.335
9.3%
4.1%
5.2%
4
3
167
2.53
—
2025151617.266.330.407.141.32111.5%7.6%3.9%8103532.34—
202441158.262.314.331.069.3248.2%6.3%1.9%23832.02—
42
.409
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
20
87.3
Median EV
47
92.3
90th % EV
27
103.0
Barrel %
4
2.6
Hard-Hit %
7
30.4
Sweet-Spot %
89
40.9
Bat Speed
Avg
10
66.9
Median
13
68.4
90th %
12
72.8
Plate Discipline
Chase %
46
29.9
Whiff %
94
10.6
K %
97
9.3
BB %
3
4.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
102
≈ 58th pctl
Chase cost
-5.6r
50 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.5r
54 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
41.1%
331 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.45
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
24214+46%13-12%8+16%19+0%12+13%85+8%13-38%21-41%22-12%16+23%133+40%10+13%16-52%29-18%17-19%16524+33%6+0%9+86%7221111CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 331