Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. OF peers

Rank #10 of 239

Each bar is one OF, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150Jackson Chourio
Jackson Chourio · #10
V⁻ 10VORP 53V⁺ 99
Jackson Chourio

Jackson Chourio

OF·MIL
Compare
Compare
PA
382
H
95
HR
17
AVG
.274
xwOBA
.344
PPG
2.65
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj97421.269.320.461.192.34321.1%6.7%14.3%16152442.52—
202684382.274
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
64
.344
xBA
50
.252
xSLG
.339
.478
.204
.344
24.1%
8.4%
15.7%
17
10
223
2.65
—
2025143590.269.310.462.193.30820.5%5.1%15.4%21213882.71—
2024151573.275.328.464.189.33121.1%6.8%14.3%21253812.52—
78
.470
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
88
92.1
Median EV
0
—
90th % EV
0
—
Barrel %
86
13.7
Hard-Hit %
78
47.1
Sweet-Spot %
30
34.1
Bat Speed
Avg
74
72.8
Median
0
—
90th %
0
—
Plate Discipline
Chase %
25
33.5
Whiff %
45
21.7
K %
29
24.1
BB %
41
8.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
125
≈ 99th pctl
Chase cost
-0.3r
4 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-0.3r
7 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
43.2%
44 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-1.50
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1111411421543124221CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 44